| User Info|
| Check This Out|
| Click for Info|
| Check this out|
| Click for Information|
| Thought for the Day|
| Webstats Domain|
|| News: The real message of Bin Laden's bizarre video rant|
Osama's Vision of the Future|
Osama's Vision of the Future
|And now, ladies and gentlemen, time for a quiz. Three guesses as to who said this: |
And Iraq and Afghanistan and their tragedies; and the reeling of many of you under the burden of interest-related debts, insane taxes and real estate mortgages; global warming and its woes; and the abject poverty and tragic hunger in Africa; all of this is but one side of the grim face of this global system.
Osama Bin Laden in a recently released video
? Naomi "No Logo
" Klein? Daniel "Dany the Red
" Cohn-Bendit? If you guessed "none of the above," you are either an astute observer of the anti-globalization movement, or you have already read a transcript
of Osama Bin Laden's latest video production. If so, you will also know that Bin Laden, after denouncing the "capitalist system," which "seeks to turn the entire world into a fiefdom of the major corporations," calls for Americans to convert to Islam because, among other things, taxes are lower in Islamic states. It's a genuinely bizarre, almost ridiculous document—and before it is forgotten in the coming debate on Gen. David Petraeus' Iraq report, it's worth spending a few minutes, on the sixth anniversary of Sept. 11, trying to understand what it might mean.
I am not alone, I should note, in wondering whether a man who is supposedly hiding in the Hindu Kush
could possibly care about the "insane taxes and real estate mortgages" endured by Americans. A number of commentators are suspicious about the video, in which Bin Laden has dyed his beard jet black—either a sign he intends to renew his jihad
or evidence that the tape, though authenticated
by the CIA, is fake
. Others wonder whether the speech, which makes approving references to the wisdom of Noam Chomsky yet garbles the chronology of the Vietnam War, might actually have been written by Adam Gadahn
, an American who does English-language propaganda for al-Qaida, has been indicted for treason, and now features on a Department of Justice "wanted
" Web site, along with Bin Laden himself.
Real or fake, the message might still hint at the direction in which al-Qaida propaganda, or at least al-Qaida propaganda designed for the Western market, is now heading. In a recent Slate
piece, Reza Aslan eloquently described how the organization's list of alleged "grievances
"—which now include global warming, corporate capitalism, and African poverty, as well as the American bases in Saudi Arabia—weave "local and global resentments into a single anti-American narrative, the overarching aim of which is to form a collective identity across borders and nationalities." But the narrative clearly isn't meant for only the Arab world. On the contrary, perhaps it's time to take the main message seriously: Clearly, al-Qaida's long-term goal is to convert Americans and other Westerners to its extreme version of Islam.
Before you fall over laughing, think again. It would only take a very few such converts to do a lot of damage. The results of the Soviet Union's massive propaganda campaign on behalf of world Marxist revolution were also numerically small, but at the time, they were considered very effective: the Baader-Meinhof
gang, the Italian Red Brigades
, the Weather Underground
. There are always disaffected young people—Gadahn is a former fan of "death metal" rock bands—and they're always looking for a cause. Conversion in general is increasingly common across Europe. Some 4,000 Germans were found to convert annually in a recent study
, and if only 0.1 percent of them choose the jihadist version of Islam, that's enough to cause trouble.
For, as news from Germany well illustrates, there is nothing quite so passionate as a recent convert. At least two of the men recently arrested and accused of plotting to bomb American interests in Germany were ...
Posted by Editor on Wednesday, September 12 @ 09:25:16 EDT (6778 reads)|
(Read More... | 8054 bytes more | comments? | News | Score: 0)
|| News: Iraq corruption whistleblowers face penalties|
Iraq corruption whistleblowers face penalties|
Cases show fraud exposers have been vilified, fired, or detained for weeks
One after another, the men and women who have stepped forward to report corruption in the massive effort to rebuild Iraq have been vilified, fired and demoted.
For daring to report illegal arms sales, Navy veteran Donald Vance says he was imprisoned by the American military in a security compound outside Baghdad and subjected to harsh interrogation methods.
Photo: John David Mercer / AP
Robert Isakson filed a whistleblower suit against a contractor in 2004 alleging the company bilked the U.S. government out of tens of millions of dollars. A judge later threw out a $10-million ruling in his favor.
There were times, huddled on the floor in solitary confinement with that head-banging music blaring dawn to dusk and interrogators yelling the same questions over and over, that Vance began to wish he had just kept his mouth shut.
He had thought he was doing a good and noble thing when he started telling the FBI about the guns and the land mines and the rocket-launchers — all of them being sold for cash, no receipts necessary, he said. He told a federal agent the buyers were Iraqi insurgents, American soldiers, State Department workers, and Iraqi embassy and ministry employees.
The seller, he claimed, was the Iraqi-owned company he worked for, Shield Group Security Co.
“It was a Wal-Mart for guns,” he says. “It was all illegal and everyone knew it.”
So Vance says he blew the whistle, supplying photos and documents and other intelligence to an FBI agent in his hometown of Chicago because he didn’t know whom to trust in Iraq.
For his trouble, he says, he got 97 days in Camp Cropper, an American military prison outside Baghdad that once held Saddam Hussein, and he was ...
Posted by Editor on Saturday, August 25 @ 10:39:10 EDT (4144 reads)|
(Read More... | 14995 bytes more | comments? | News | Score: 0)
|| News: Why Do They Hate Us?|
Why Do They Hate Us?|
Source: MSN Slate
(Author of No god but God:
The Origins, Evolution,
and Future of Islam)
Strange answers lie in al-Qaida's writings.
Why do they hate us?
Americans have been asking this question for nearly six years now, and for six years President Bush and his accomplices have been offering the same tired response: "They hate us for our freedoms." With every passing year, that answer becomes less convincing.
Part of the problem has to do with the question itself. Who exactly are they? Are we referring to al-Qaida and its cohorts? Are we talking about Iran, Syria, and the other nation-states whose interests in the Middle East do not properly align with America's? Or perhaps we mean Hamas, Hezbollah, or the myriad religious nationalist organizations across the Muslim world that share neither the ideology nor the aspirations of global, transnational groups like al-Qaida, but that have nevertheless been dumped into the same category: them.
But what is most surprising about this question is how little interest anyone seems to have taken in examining the answers that are already on offer in multiple languages, through various media outlets, and on the Internet, from the very they
who allegedly hate us so much. A spate of books has appeared over the last year, gathering the words of America's enemies. The first and best of these is Messages to the World
, a collection of Osama Bin Laden's declarations translated by Duke University professor Bruce Lawrence, in which Bin Laden himself dismisses Bush's accusation that he hates America's freedoms. "Perhaps he can tell us why we did not attack Sweden, for example?"
Messages to the World: The Statements of Osama bin Laden (Paperback) by Osama bin Laden (Author), Bruce Lawrence (Editor), James Howarth (Translator), Osama bin Laden (Author), Bruce Lawrence (Author), James Howarth (Author)
The Al Qaeda Reader (Paperback) by Raymond Ibrahim (Editor)
Now comes a second, more complete collection, The Al Qaeda Reader
, edited and translated by Raymond Ibrahim, a research librarian at the Library of Congress. Unlike Lawrence, Ibrahim includes writings from both Bin Laden and his right-hand man, Ayman Al-Zawahiri. And while both volumes provide readers with a startling series of religious and political tracts that, when taken together, chart the evolution of a disturbing (if intellectually murky) justification for religious violence, Ibrahim's collection is marred by his insistence that his book be viewed as al-Qaida's Mein Kampf
The comparison between the scattered declarations of a cult leader literally dwelling in a cave and the political treatise of the commander in chief of one of the 20th century's most powerful nations may be imprecise, to say the least. But Ibrahim's point is that we can learn about al-Qaida's intentions by reading their words, that a book like this can help Americans better understand the nature of the anger directed toward them.
In the most general sense, this is certainly true. But whether a hodgepodge of ...
Posted by Editor on Thursday, August 09 @ 10:59:26 EDT (3555 reads)|
(Read More... | 9435 bytes more | comments? | News | Score: 0)
|| We are offering the terrorist a megaphone for his cause|
We are offering the terrorist a megaphone for his cause|
By Simon Jenkins
Hysteria politics feasts on the threat of violence, and accords the status of political crusader to the common criminal
|Don't panic. Stay calm. Don't play the terrorist's game. Show no fear or sense of disruption. Don't change your behaviour or way of life. Pass no laws curbing freedom. Just shrug and go about your normal business. |
Omigod! Now they are doctors! Wake the prime minister, round up the Arabs and order armoured helicopters. Stop the presses and clear the schedules. The fiends from outer Asia are cunning. They could be poisoning hospital drips. They could be lacing paracetamol and putting anthrax in Elastoplast. Declare another bomb "imminent". Surround Heathrow with tanks, fortify Wimbledon, put blast blocks round Waterloo and ack-ack guns on Parliament Hill. Raise the threat level from critical to panic. On second thoughts make that totally hysterical.
"Doctor Evil", cries the Sun, demanding we "Rip up the hated human rights act". "Docs of War", chimes the Mirror, discarding "innocent until proved guilty". "Terror cell in the NHS", shrieks the Express. Nor is the rest of the media much better. Fed by anonymous security officials eager to boast of their successes, almost all reports have contrived to link the bombs with al-Qaida, 9/11, the NHS, mayhem and martyrdom.
Photo: The Guardian
Comment by Simon Jenkins
The public realm in Britain is in rampant retreat before terrorism, largely because politicians and the media feast on any story involving actual or potential violence. Politicians want to present themselves as calm and statesmanlike, yet visible, defenders of public security, as their poll ratings soar. Gordon Brown's "strength" rating jumped 14 points in a Times/Populus poll yesterday. The media can revel in fear journalism, throwing all sense of proportion to the winds and filling pages and airwaves with speculation as to what "might have happened if ..." and what "could yet happen unless ...", scanning that horizon so appetising to every news desk: the worst-case scenario. The BBC re-enacts a Pythonesque sketch with a white-haired boffin igniting a can of petrol in a sandpit and remarking that it could have been a thousand times worse. The word suspect has become synonymous with mass murderer.
The sanest person last Friday was the reviled Downing Street official who decided not to wake the prime minister at two in the morning to tell him of suspect cars in the West End. Nobody was dead. The police were on the case. The home secretary had been woken (a deed apparently vital to any anti-terror operation). Matters would be clearer by breakfast. Leave the poor man his sleep.
Gordon Brown was reportedly furious at not being disturbed. Hysteria politics demands that the prime minister be roused in the middle of the night. Under the old regime, Tony Blair and John Reid would have ...
Posted by Editor on Thursday, July 05 @ 04:00:00 EDT (3436 reads)|
(Read More... | 7483 bytes more | 1 comment | Score: 0)
|| News: Terror on the Tracks|
Terror on the Tracks|
By Carl Prine
Let's say the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reporter really was a terrorist.
What if those were bombs he was placing on the chemical placard of a rail car inside the Thatcher Chemical Co. plant in suburban Las Vegas, and not his business cards?
Instead of a camera recording lax security over some of the deadliest chemicals ever produced, he held a detonator? And the string of chlorine gas cars trundling down Union Pacific Railroad tracks in the heart of Vegas was his prey?
If he was a terrorist, and his goal was to release a potentially catastrophic cloud of deadly gases, explosives and caustic acids -- in unguarded cars, left abandoned -- then a U.S. Department of Homeland Security's
planning scenario might apply: 17,500 people dead, another 10,000 suffering injuries and 100,000 more flooding trauma wards, convinced they've been poisoned. The environmental damage would take weeks to clean up, forcing the evacuation of as many as 70,000 residents from a city built on sin, military might and heavy industry
Less detailed and unlikely "Worst Case Scenario"
plans filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency suggest the gases that could be released by the reporter perched atop millions of pounds of zinc chloride, phosphoric and sulfuric acids, and chlorine gas could drift 18 miles and threaten 1.1 million people with death, displacement or injury
But, luckily, he was only a reporter.
Five years after terrorists murdered 2,996 people in the Sept. 11 attacks, the Trib embarked on a probe to see how well railroads and their customers secure lethal hazardous materials -- termed "hazmat" by first responders. The road map: Reports compiled since 2003 by the Federal Railroad Administration
detailing defects in the way railroads and chemical plants conducted counter-terrorism security planning and worker training.
Armed with that data, the Trib penetrated 48 plants and the freight lines that service them to reach potentially catastrophic chemicals in populated parts of Seattle, Tacoma, Atlanta, Pittsburgh, Las Vegas, San Francisco's Bay Area and the New Jersey suburbs, as well as two port facilities in Oregon and Washington.
"What you uncovered is a criminal tragedy, and it's a criminal tragedy that's just waiting to happen. It's also criminal what we haven't done about this," said U.S. Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Delaware, who has sponsored legislation designed to revamp rail hazmat security nationwide and pledges to hold hearings on the issue.
Biden has taken at least 7,000 round trips by rail from his home in Wilmington to Washington, D.C., since entering the Senate in 1972. He routinely talks to railworkers, and when he pulls into a depot, he scans for hazmat tankers, guards and gates.
He loves railroads so much that he wants to protect them by slashing tax cuts and take the extra cash to fund every recommendation of the 9/11 Commission that investigated the 2001 attacks. He demands more federal cops in the rail yards, more cameras and gates, less dangerous chemicals on the tracks and rerouting of particularly lethal shipments around big cities.
"All you have to do is look," Biden said. "I can walk into a freight yard right now, and I can put plastique explosive on a railcar and detonate it. This is a distant concern to many people in Washington, D.C., but I see and I hear about it every day and we have to do something about it."
The Association of American Railroads
, with a membership hauling almost 90 percent of the nation's hazmat tank cars, said freight security has improved since 2001 but conceded more has to be done to protect 240,000 miles of mostly unguarded line.
"You've got to remember the open architecture of railroads," said Nancy Wilson, AAR vice president and director of security. "We're not static facilities. We cannot protect every railcar, every rail yard or every customer's facility all the time."
In the years since the Sept. 11 attacks, intelligence tips have warned about U.S. chemical plant targets and terrorists have hit freight trains abroad. Still, Homeland Security and the AAR insist there's no indication that terrorists are plotting hazmat rail attacks in the U.S. now.
Good thing, because the Trib found:
- Little visible differences in security between the largest and smallest train lines. The Trib easily reached hazmat shipments or locomotives controlled by 12 railroads, ranging from giant Union Pacific to the tiny, city-owned Tacoma Municipal Beltline. Workers never challenged the reporter as he climbed trains, photographed derailing levers or peeked into signaling boxes controlling rail traffic.
- No police presence. Despite long trips down tracks nationwide, no rail cops detained the reporter. At a Clifton, N.J., station where explosive railcars hug teeming commuter lines, a Transit Police cruiser idled unconcerned while the reporter spent an hour around hazmat cars. According to the railroads, fewer than 2,300 cops patrol the tracks, about one for every 100 miles.
- Shoddy security even at 11 refineries, railroads and chemical plants bound by "stringent" voluntary guidelines created by the AAR and other industries. The Trib penetrated security at four railways adhering to AAR's guidelines. Seven plants that had voluntarily upgraded security to meet standards of their trade groups also had tracks open to terrorists.
No executive at a large railroad would talk to the Trib about the newspaper's findings. Local and state security officials in California, Washington and Georgia also were silent when the Trib tried to discuss hazmat security.
"Closing gates, making sure workers and guards and police are aware of our chemicals, that's important," said Commission Supervisor Larry Casey. "Unfortunately, the farther we get from 9/11, the more people forget about staying vigilant.
"Then there's the funding issue. The federal pot gets smaller and smaller. The farther we get from the major event in our lives, the threat goes up while the money to stop it goes down."
Chlorine gas unguarded in the suburbs of Las Vegas. The Trib reached 11 tankers filled with deadly gases and acids inside plants or along tracks in one of America's largest cities.
In 2001, five of the 19 al-Qaida terrorists visited Las Vegas before hijacking airliners for suicide missions to Manhattan and Washington, D.C.
Las Vegas annually hosts more than 37 million visitors. The city received about $28 million in federal counter-terrorism funding last year, but officials have been told that's being scaled back, leaving almost nothing for safeguarding the tracks latticing the city.
According to Homeland Security's Inspector General, 90 percent of taxpayer anti-terrorism funding has gone to protecting aviation. In 2006, $4.6 billion flowed to securing U.S. airports, leaving $32 million for safeguarding surface transportation, including railroads.
The Burning of Atlanta
Following FRA's deficiency reports to 12 facilities near Atlanta, the Trib found numerous security snafus in one of Dixie's largest cities.
lines in Dekalb County, a Trib reporter climbed unguarded stores of deadly insecticides, flammable petroleum distillates and acetone, a chemical that can trigger a vapor cloud explosion if leaked.
Since 2003, FRA has noted 53 defects with CSX counter-terrorism planning and training in five states, including Georgia.
A year ago, FRA reported that Bulkmatic's plant in the Atlanta suburbs failed to properly address potential intruders. A fence "locked" with almost 2 feet of slack meant a Trib reporter could stroll by employees there who made no effort to challenge him. Federal inspectors had previously written up Bulkmatic chemical operations there and in Buffalo and Chicago for security problems.
After visiting Alchem's Atlanta's caustic soda operation in 2005, an ...
Posted by Editor on Tuesday, July 03 @ 02:48:10 EDT (6063 reads)|
(Read More... | 23289 bytes more | comments? | News | Score: 0)
|| News: Developing nations to slam US global cop role|
nations to slam US global cop role|
By Anthony Boadle
HAVANA (Reuters) - Developing nations will denounce the United States' role
as global policeman at a summit in Havana this week, Cuban Foreign Minister
Felipe Perez Roque said on Sunday.
Perez Roque said the summit was not organized to attack the United States but
developing countries could not remain silent over "unilateral" actions taken by
Washington in policing the world since the Afghanistan and Iraq wars.
"This summit will denounce the threats of preventive wars, the proclaimed
rights of the world's only superpower to occupy countries illegally and change
regimes, and the existence of secret prisons for torture," he said at a news
Diplomats said moderates like India and other nations friendly with
Washington wanted no such finger-pointing at the United States during the
Some 50 heads of state and government will attend the meeting of the
116-nation Non-Aligned Movement.
Cuban leader Fidel Castro, Washington's longest-lasting ideological foe, may
not be well enough to attend the meetings.
Perez Roque said he did not know if ...
Posted by Editor on Sunday, September 17 @ 04:00:00 EDT (2690 reads)|
(Read More... | 4081 bytes more | 13 comments | News | Score: 0)
|| News: Iraq is Not War on Terror, Say Americans|
is Not War on Terror, Say Americans|
Reid Global Scan
Polls & Research
Many adults in the United States think the coalition effort is not related to
the operation in Afghanistan, according to a poll by Opinion Research
Corporation released by CNN. 53 per cent of respondents think the Iraq war is
not part of the U.S.-led war on terror.
Afghanistan has been the main battleground in the war on terrorism. The
conflict began in October 2001, after the Taliban regime refused to hand over
Osama bin Laden, prime suspect in the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York and
Washington. Al-Qaeda operatives hijacked and crashed four airplanes on Sept. 11,
2001, killing nearly 3,000 people.
At least 471 soldiers—including 333 Americans—have died in the war on
terrorism, either in support of the U.S.-led Operation Enduring Freedom or as
part of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) led by the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). 62 per cent of respondents believe neither
side is wining the war on terror.
The coalition effort against Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq was launched in
March 2003. At least 2,671 American soldiers have died during the military
operation, and more than 20,100 troops have been wounded in action.
On Sept. 11, U.S. president George W. Bush addressed the nation to discuss
the war on terrorism. Bush declared, "I’m often asked why we’re in Iraq when
Saddam Hussein was not responsible for the 9/11 attacks. The answer is that the
regime of Saddam Hussein was a clear threat. My administration, the Congress,
and the United Nations saw the threat—and after 9/11, Saddam’s regime posed a
risk that the world could not afford to take. The world is safer because Saddam
Hussein is no longer in power."
Do you think the Iraq war is part of the U.S.-led war on terror?
Who do you think is winning the war on terror?
The United States
Source: Opinion Research Corporation / CNN
interviews with 1,004 American adults, conducted from Aug. 30 to Sept. 2, 2006.
Margin of error is 5 per cent.
Posted by Editor on Saturday, September 16 @ 04:00:00 EDT (2605 reads)|
(Read More... | 3355 bytes more | 7 comments | News | Score: 0)
|| News: The Middle East after the 9/11 attacks: an Israeli view|
Middle East after the 9/11 attacks: an Israeli view|
Daily Star - Lebanon, Lebanon
By Yossi Alpher
The events of September 11, 2001, altered the
Israeli-Palestinian equation both directly and indirectly.
Directly, because Israeli Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat fairly quickly sorted
themselves out into the two dichotomous camps that emerged in the Bush
administration's view of the Middle East after 9/11: good guys and bad guys;
those who supported the American war on terror and those who (accurately or not)
were deemed to be against it.
With regard to terrorism, this development
dramatically upgraded the Israeli-American alliance. Yet, this was hardly an
automatic outcome of 9/11. After all, Arafat also condemned the Al-Qaeda attacks
(though the Palestinian "street" seemingly did not). And Israel initially dealt
with the ramifications of 9/11 clumsily. Sharon briefly angered the United
States by comparing Bush to Chamberlain. I recall a senior American official
telling a senior Israeli, to the latter's consternation, that for the US 9/11
was the equivalent of the Holocaust, thereby implying that its ramifications
were not open to Israeli interpretation or manipulation - as in comparing Arafat
to Osama bin Laden or equating the Palestinians with the Al-Qaeda terrorists.
Ultimately it was the Karine-A affair - the attempt by Arafat to import
sophisticated weaponry from Iran in January 2002, several months after 9/11 -
that sealed Arafat's fate in American eyes by allying him with the "axis of
Israelis, in the midst of the intifada, felt
a huge sense of relief: They were no longer alone in the struggle against ...
Posted by Editor on Thursday, September 14 @ 04:00:00 EDT (3396 reads)|
(Read More... | 6576 bytes more | 13 comments | News | Score: 0)
|| News: If Only Bin Laden Had a Stained Blue Dress...|
If Only Bin Laden Had a
Stained Blue Dress...|
| If you wonder why it took 50 years to get the truth about Joe McCarthy, consider
the fanatical campaign of the Clinton acolytes to kill an ABC movie that relies
on the 9/11 Commission Report, which whitewashed only 90 percent of Clinton's
cowardice and incompetence in the face of terrorism, rather than 100 percent.
Islamic jihadists attacked America year after year throughout the Clinton
administration. They did everything but blow up his proverbial "bridge to the
21st century." Every year but one, Clinton found an excuse not to fight
The first month Clinton was in office, Islamic terrorists with suspected
links to al-Qaida and Saddam Hussein bombed the World Trade Center.
For the first time ever, a terrorist act against America was treated not as a
matter of national security, but exclusively as a simple criminal offense. The
individual bombers were tried in a criminal court. (The one plotter who got away
fled to Iraq, that peaceful haven of kite-flying children until Bush invaded and
turned it into a nation of dangerous lunatics.)
In 1995 and 1996, various branches of the Religion of Peace -- al-Qaida,
Hezbollah and the Iranian "Party of God" -- staged car bomb attacks on American
servicemen in Saudi Arabia, killing 24 members of our military in all. Each
time, the Clinton administration came up with an excuse to do nothing.
Despite the Democrats' current claim that only the capture of Osama bin Laden
will magically end terrorism forever, Clinton turned down Sudan's offer to hand
us bin Laden in 1996. That year, Mohammed Atta proposed the 9/11 attack to bin
Clinton refused the handover of ...
Posted by Editor on Wednesday, September 13 @ 19:28:38 EDT (3594 reads)|
(Read More... | 6895 bytes more | 11 comments | News | Score: 0)
|| News: Partnering with Pakistan|
By Lisa Curtis
We need to broaden counterterrorism efforts there
Two major terrorism plots in the last six weeks highlight the central role that
Pakistan plays in addressing global terrorism — a role that could become larger
and more successful if officials in Washington and Islamabad make the right
One of these plots — a plan to blow up airline flights mid-air between the
United Kingdom and the United States — was successfully thwarted because
British, American, and Pakistani security agencies worked together. The other —
a series of bombings July 11 that killed nearly 200 on commuter trains in
Mumbai, India — has been linked by Indian officials to a terrorist group
operating in Pakistan. Investigations into both plots continue and will require
full Pakistani cooperation and follow-up.
Early revelations related to
the airliner plot indicate that the would-be terrorists likely received
direction, training, inspiration, and/or funding through sources located in
Pakistan. Reports emerged last week that one of the main figures involved in the
plot — British citizen Rashid Rauf, who was arrested in Pakistan earlier this
month –- had previously been a member of a Pakistan-based terrorist group that
operates in Indian Kashmir, the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM). The other suspects —
also mainly British citizens of Pakistani origin — presumably conducted
meetings, operations, and fundraising efforts in the U.K. and possibly other
countries. Of course, their links to Pakistan do not directly implicate the
state. In fact, U.S. and British officials have praised Pakistan for its
assistance in preventing the attack.
Pakistani cooperation in the War on
Terror has been critical in ...
Posted by Editor on Sunday, August 27 @ 04:00:00 EDT (2870 reads)|
(Read More... | 10167 bytes more | 12 comments | News | Score: 0)
|| News: Terrorism's Enablers|
By David Frum
Attention nervous flyers: Don't think you can escape the terrorists by taking
On July 31, an alert German train conductor spotted an abandoned suitcase on a
regional train as it passed through the city of Dortmund, in western Germany. That
same day a similar suitcase was found near Koblenz, in the German south. The two suitcases
contained bottles of gasoline, propane gas and detonators--a deadly effective
firebomb that could have killed or horribly burned hundreds of travellers. They
were wired to explode at the same time, with at least as much force as the 7/7
bombings in London.
At a press conference yesterday,
German police announced they had identified two suspects in the case: Two men
were photographed by surveillance cameras carrying the suitcases into the
Cologne railway station--the station from which
the Dortmund and Koblenz trains had departed. The suitcases had
been stuffed with clothes to prevent the gasoline bottles from rattling. On
examination, the clothes proved to contain little pieces of paper covered in
With London and
German suitcase bombs raise to three the number of mega-murder plots exposed in
this single summer. Had police been less vigilant or less lucky, we could well
now be mourning the deaths of thousands of American and British air travellers,
Canadian office workers and German commuters.
But let's not get carried
away by relief and enthusiasm.
For even as Western police forces become
more capable, our terrorist enemies become in their way more
Increasingly they are born on native soil. They speak the
language with a local accent--and are protected by all the legal rights of
Three of the 24 British suspects arrested have turned out to
be converts to Islam. Daniel Pipes has long warned that extremist Islam might
replace radical leftism as the default ideology for angry and alienated young
people looking for an alternative to democratic capitalism. Those warnings seem
now to be coming true.
It might have been hoped that the spread of
extremism among Western Muslim communities would jolt those communities into
soul-searching and self-criticism; into a rejection of violence, intolerance and
anti-Semitism. Some suggested that Western Muslim communities would develop a
new democratic Islam that might be re-exported back into the Middle East.
No doubt there are individual Muslims
in the West working hard at these vital tasks even as we ...
Posted by Editor on Friday, August 25 @ 04:00:00 EDT (7094 reads)|
(Read More... | 6278 bytes more | 17 comments | News | Score: 0)
|| News: Fighting Words: The Abuse of Islam in Political Rhetoric|
Words: The Abuse of Islam in Political Rhetoric|
By Ali Khan, Washburn
University School of Law
It is becoming fashionable for elected officials in
the Anglo-American world, notably in the United States and the United Kingdom,
to employ abusive language involving Islam. Phrases such as "Islamic terrorism,"
"totalitarian Islam," "crimes of Islam," and "Islamic fascism" are freely used,
with sadist disrespect, to condemn real and imagined terrorists who practice the
faith of Islam. For years, and long before the 9/11 attacks, neo-conservative
scholarship has been determined to popularize the concept of the essentialist
terrorist [PDF] who purportedly draws his deepest inspiration from the
puritanical beliefs of Islam and equipped with cruelty, commits violence against
innocent Jews and Christians. According to this, occupations, invasions,
territorial thefts, assassinations, house demolitions, human rights violations,
and other such grievances have nothing to do with Islamic resistance. Islamic
terrorism, according to neo-conservative scholarship, stems from the Sharia,
from passages of the Quran, and from a puritanical mindset that manufactures
pretexts to maim and kill. These killers, it is further contended, wish to
impose Islamic law over the entire world.
Gradually but successfully,
the propagandized essentialist terrorist and the attendant abusive language
against Islam have entered political rhetoric. Presidents, prime ministers,
congressmen, senators, and other officials are now freely using abusive language
to malign Islam, not through uncaught moments of Freudian slips but as a policy
of expressive audacity.
Commenting on the alleged plan of British
nationals of Pakistani descent to blow up US-bound planes over the Atlantic,
President Bush said: "This is a stark reminder that this nation is at war with
Islamic fascists." Senator Rick Santorum distinguishes between terrorism and
Islamic fascism, arguing that terrorism is a tactic but what the West is
fighting is “Islamic fascism” which is “truly evil” and which is “as big a
threat today as Nazism and communism.”
This new trend to openly curse
Islam echoes the ...
Posted by Editor on Thursday, August 24 @ 04:00:00 EDT (3656 reads)|
(Read More... | 7032 bytes more | 5 comments | News | Score: 0)
|| News: United States calls for cessation of hostilities|
States calls for cessation of hostilities|
Siber News Media, NY
By Shakuntala Perera
a) The United States yesterday called for an immediate cessation of hostilities
from both Sri Lankan government and the LTTE, while reiterating its ban on the
Comments against (a):
Banning the LTTE, one of the parties to the conflict by US, EU
or Canada does not lead to Peace but as seen now, leads to war. It smacks of
double standard and hypocrisy, when the United States calls in common, for an
immediate cessation of hostilities from both the government and the LTTE,
knowing very well that, the LTTE is ever ready, but the Government is not ready
with its hawkish policies.
Further, very unreasonably, and impartially it reiterates its
ban only on the LTTE, while allowing the Singhalese regime who commits high
profile atrocities over the Tamils to go scot-free. Furthermore, making a
mountain out of a molehill, it is very keen on banning the LTTE when it, resorts
to retaliatory attacks against the armed forces.
b) Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary South and Central Asian
Affairs, Ambassador Steven Mann ending a two day visit to Sri Lanka maintained
that ‘there was a clear responsibility for the LTTE to cease all acts of
violence immediately and return to negotiations.’
Comments against (b):
If the US maintains genuinely that both parties should strictly adhere to the
cease-fire agreement, and the party which violates would be found fault with,
then it could be a signal to indicate that they have a judicious view on the
conflict. US can easily find out from the facilitators of the peace process
based on a Cease-fire agreement, as to who has violated the CFA.
strange twist of fate, that Ambassador Steven Mann is ominously silent about the
daily brutal massacres by SL govt. forces including the killings of seventeen
humanitarian aid agency workers last week and sixty-one school children this
week but he expects the LTTE not to retaliate! One is at a loss to understand
his logic or his lopsided sense of justice and fairplay that condones state
terrorism, while condemning retaliatory attacks! His comments lack impartiality
to be taken seriously.
c) Meeting the media immediately after meeting
President Rajapaksa last evening he said the US was ‘deeply concerned’ about the
fighting in the recent past.
Comments against (c):
US need to be ...
Posted by Editor on Wednesday, August 23 @ 04:00:00 EDT (3807 reads)|
(Read More... | 17834 bytes more | 9 comments | News | Score: 0)
|| News: A Troubling Prosecution|
By Jonathan H. Adler & Michael Berry
United States v. Rosen has its thorns
Can journalists be prosecuted for knowingly reporting classified information
related to the War on Terror? What about Washington lobbyists who pass on secret
information concerning defense matters or foreign affairs? Some would be
inclined to say that except in the most exceptional circumstances such
communications are protected by the First Amendment, but a recent decision by a
federal court in Virginia seems to conclude otherwise. The decision sends a
clear warning to reporters who cover the war on terrorism, as well as scholars,
think-tank analysts, and lobbyists who study, write, and advocate about issues
bearing on the national security. Read broadly, the decision could sanction
federal prosecution of anyone who willfully communicates classified national
defense information to the public. Fortunately, the decision also contains
limiting language that provides some safeguard for First Amendment values and
makes it more difficult for federal prosecutors to convict potential defendants
engaged in constitutionally protected activity, journalists and non-journalists
The case — United States v. Rosen — involves two former
employees of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) charged with
conspiring to communicate “information relating to the national defense” to
someone “not entitled to receive it” in violation of Section 793 of the
Espionage Act. Their alleged co-conspirator, a former Defense Department
employee, has already pled guilty.
Although reference to the Espionage
Act conjures up images of covert spying and leaking, neither lobbyist is charged
with such covert acts. Instead, the defendants’ alleged misconduct sounds a lot
like what Washington lobbyists, reporters, and academics do every day. The
indictment details a series of phone calls and meetings between the lobbyists
and a contact at the Department of Defense. Some of the meetings were over
breakfast and lunch. One was at a baseball game, and another was at Union
Station. During the meetings, the Defense Department employee allegedly passed
along classified information to the two lobbyists. According to the indictment,
the lobbyists then passed that information on to others at AIPAC, “a senior
fellow at a Washington, D.C. think tank,” foreign officials, and reporters, all
in violation of the Espionage Act.
Conservatives have lined up on both
sides of the case. The indictment was brought by ...
Posted by Editor on Tuesday, August 22 @ 04:00:00 EDT (5672 reads)|
(Read More... | 12101 bytes more | 5 comments | News | Score: 0)
|| News: IRAN'S TERROR GIFTS|
FrontPage magazine.com, CA
By FrontPage Magazine
The San Francisco Chronicle reports that Israelis have found sensitive night-vision
goggles on Hezbollah fighters that originated in the UK. The
tactical equipment appears to come from a shipment sent from the British
government to Iran in 2003, intended to help interdict narcotics. Instead, the
Iranians put them to another use entirely (via The Asylum):
Israeli intelligence officials have complained to Britain and the
United States that sensitive night-vision equipment recovered from Hezbollah
fighters during the war in Lebanon had been exported by Britain to Iran. British
officials said the equipment had been intended for use in a U.N. anti-narcotics
Israeli officials say they believe the state-of-the-art equipment, found in
Hezbollah command-and-control headquarters in southern Lebanon during the
just-concluded war, was part of a British government-approved shipment of 250
pieces of night-vision equipment sent to Iran in 2003.
Israeli military intelligence confirmed that one of the pieces of equipment
is a Thermo-vision 1000 LR tactical night-vision system, serial No. 155010, part
No. 193960, manufactured by Agema, a high-tech equipment company with branches
in Bedfordshire, England, and San Diego. A spokesman for Agema in San Diego
denied all knowledge of the system.
The equipment, which needed special export-license approval from the British
government, was passed to the Iranians through a program run and administered by
the U.N. Drug Control Program. The equipment uses infrared imaging to provide
nighttime surveillance that allows the user to detect people and vehicles moving
in the dark at a range of several miles.
The UN-brokered program has allowed the UK to sell military equipment to the
Iranians despite the standoff over the nuclear program in Teheran. The Iranians
were supposed to use the goggles to track nocturnal movements of drugrunners
trying to get heroin and opium over the Afghanistan-Iran border. Instead of
stopping the flow of drugs, however, the goggles allowed Hezbollah guerillas to ...
Posted by Editor on Monday, August 21 @ 09:45:01 EDT (2494 reads)|
(Read More... | 3940 bytes more | 15 comments | News | Score: 0)
|| News: Why We MUST Profile|
Why We MUST Profile|
FrontPage magazine.com, CA
By Robert Spencer
To profile or not to profile? Some recent suspicious incidents involving mass purchase of cell phones by Middle Eastern men have given this debate a new urgency.
On Tuesday, terrorism charges were dropped against two Muslims from Dearborn, Michigan, who had been arrested in Ohio. Ali Houssaiky and Osama Sabhi Abulhassan had been stopped for a traffic violation a week before; in their car, sheriff’s deputies found $11,000 in cash, airline passenger lists, material about airport security procedures, and twelve cell phones. It turned out that they had bought 600 cell phones recently.
Cell phones can be used as detonators. They’re also a ready means of non-traceable communication, as well as an easy source of ready cash, as they can be resold to people who don’t want their calls traceable. There have been several other strange incidents involving mass purchase of such phones recently: three Palestinians were recently arrested in Texas with 1,000 cell phones in their van, and there was another incident involving “Middle Eastern men” buying cell phones in large quantities in Tucson, Arizona.
These incidents, especially all coming around the same time, are extremely suspicious, but even before prosecutors dropped the terror charges against Houssaiky and Abulhassan, charges of racial profiling began surfacing in the mainstream media. A public defender handling Abulhassan’s case, Ray Smith, said of his client at a hearing: “If his name was Joe Smith, we wouldn’t be here. His origin and appearance and name condition us to (think), ‘Oh my gosh, he’s a terrorist.’” The dropping of the charges will only reinforce this impression, despite the fact that many questions remain about the case and Washington County, Ohio Prosecutor James Schneider said that he still might press terrorism-related charges against the pair. According to AP, “Relatives of the men said they were just trying to make money by reselling the phones and were targeted because of their Arab backgrounds.”
It is unclear, however, what those who are charging that racial profiling was a factor in the arrest of Houssaiky and Abulhassan would have preferred to have happened. The facts of the case remain that they had lists of airline passengers, information on airport security, a large amount of cash, and instruments capable of being used as detonators. I hope that in such circumstances – given the fact that jihad terrorists have abundantly established their taste for targeting airplanes -- investigators would have looked into the possibility of terrorism even if Houssaiky and Abulhassan had been two Norwegian grandmothers.
But the fact that they are two young Muslim men makes this ...
Posted by Editor on Thursday, August 17 @ 04:05:00 EDT (6786 reads)|
(Read More... | 10478 bytes more | 11 comments | News | Score: 0)
| Check this out|
| Old Articles|
There isn't content right now for this block.|
| Click for Info|